The current political
climate in both the US and Europe is straining the standard conceptions of
political ideology. Traditional
terminology like left, right, and center haven’t been adequate to characterize
Trump, Brexit supporters, or the Greek governing coalition. To address this ambiguity, I’ve been trying
to examine two relevant issues. First
off, I’ve tried to understand what the left/right ideological spectrum really
describes. On top of that, I’ve tried to
understand what additional ideological descriptors we need to use to give more
complete description of what ideologies underlie the movements that affect the
world right now. I’ve decided to write a
bit about my unauthoritative thoughts on these two issues. Hopefully, we can start a conversation that
will help me (and maybe the rest of you) clarify the meaning of these political
philosophies. I'm particularly sketchy on what terminology I should use to label each of the seven factors that I'm going to discribe, so if some of them seem wrong or inadequate, just share your thoughts and I'll try to replace it with something better.
So, I’m going to
start by sharing my thoughts on what left and right mean in terms of political
ideology. I’ve often heard people refer
to the supposed dichotomy between fiscal/economic ideology and “social”
ideology by saying that someone is, for example, “socially liberal and fiscally
conservative.” In my opinion, however, the
“social” dimension should be separated into two parts, which leaves us with
three components that combine to produce a leftist or rightist political
orientation. For lack of better names, I
would call the components economic, social, and cultural.
The economic
component is probably the most salient, although that may be changing. I would define economic leftism as the belief
that the government is better than markets at guiding the economy, that positive
liberty is more important than negative liberty, and that redistribution is
more important than wealth creation. The
economic right would likewise favor markets, negative liberty, and wealth
creation. Of course, there are many more
possible combinations of beliefs and many subtleties that may underlie them, but
I think the sum of those three tendencies is a decent representation of
left/right ideology regarding the economy.
I’m not sure that
I’ve ever heard anyone distinguish between what I call social ideology and cultural
ideology, but I think the two concepts are independent enough to be worth
separating. On the one hand, I would
define social ideology as a relative preference between “outgroup” and “ingroup”
interests, which I think correspond to what people might call “social justice”
and “group interest”. Opinions regarding
immigration and nationalism would likely fit into this dimension, as might
those on race and gender. The cultural
dimension would then measure positions between modernism and cultural flexibility
on the left and traditionalism and cultural rigidity on the right. Distinguishing between the social and
cultural components of rightism makes it easier to describe the divisions that occurred
in the 2016 Republican Primaries, when Trump was clearly the farthest to the
right on the issue of group interest, but several other candidates were much
farther to the right on cultural issues.
This distinction also helps make sense of movements, particularly in
Western Europe, that seek to stop immigration from Muslim nations in order to
protect liberal values. I would call
those movements socially rightist, but culturally leftist.
Ok, so I’ve
described three ways of categorizing political orientations. But, how do they fit together? The best answer I’ve been able to give myself
is that all three components deal with some distinction between insiders and
outsiders, although those terms are defined differently in each case. Obviously, the social component represents
beliefs about social groups that are more or less included in the general
population. Less literally, the cultural
dimension deals with insiders and outsiders relative to traditional cultural
norms and the economic dimension deals with insiders and outsiders relative to
economic position. So, leftism would be
a general tendency to oppose undue influence by “insiders” and rightism would
be a general tendency to oppose undue influence by “outsiders.” Or something like that….
In my next post,
I’ll talk about some of the ideological orientations that I see as independent
of left/right classification. Whatever your thoughts are on this issue, please share them below.